More Dutch People Report Crime in Their Area Than Bulgarians Do

Silver Data Lab Research Desk · Statistical analysis · Published on 24 May 2026

Data source
Eurostat
Reference period
2023
Last updated
24 May 2026

Key estimates

  • 10.0% of the EU population reported crime, violence or vandalism in their area in 2023.
  • Greece records 20.9%, the Netherlands 16.7% and Bulgaria 15.6%.
  • Croatia records 1.4%, Lithuania 2.7% and Poland 2.8%.
  • The Dutch rate is twelve times the Croatian one.
  • This is a survey question about perception, not a count of offences, and the two do not rank countries the same way.
Share of the population reporting crime, violence or vandalism in their area in 2023: Greece 20.9%, the Netherlands 16.7% and Bulgaria 15.6% above the EU rate of 10.0%, and Poland 2.8%, Lithuania 2.7% and Croatia 1.4% below it.

What people say about where they live

Households are asked whether they experience crime, violence or vandalism in their local area. The answer is a perception of the immediate environment, not a report of having been a victim and not a count of offences recorded by police.

Across the EU in 2023, 10.0% said yes.

The Netherlands

The Netherlands records 16.7%, second in the Union. That is the result that makes this indicator interesting rather than confirmatory.

It is one of the wealthiest Member States, records among the highest life satisfaction, the lowest NEET rate in the Union and near-universal digital and material provision. On this measure it sits above Bulgaria, Romania and Italy.

Several things plausibly contribute and none is established here. The Netherlands is densely populated — Dutch regions are among the most crowded in the Union outside city-states — and urban density raises the visibility of vandalism and public disorder regardless of its level. Reporting norms may also differ: a population that expects a well-maintained public environment may register deterioration a population with lower expectations would not.

The important point is narrower than any of those explanations. A perception question does not measure the same thing as a crime statistic, and the Dutch position demonstrates it clearly enough that no further argument is needed.

Greece and Bulgaria

Greece records 20.9%, the highest in the Union, and Bulgaria 15.6%.

Both are Member States where this site records poor outcomes across a range of indicators: Greece has the highest unmet medical need, the highest housing cost overburden and the lowest life satisfaction after Bulgaria, which records the lowest of all.

Where perceived neighbourhood problems coincide with poor material conditions, the perception is more likely to be tracking something real about the local environment. That is a reasonable reading for Greece and Bulgaria and a poor one for the Netherlands, and the indicator does not tell you which case you are looking at.

The low end

Croatia records 1.4%, Lithuania 2.7%, Poland 2.8% and Slovenia.

A figure of 1.4% means roughly one household in seventy reports any crime, violence or vandalism in its area. Whether Croatian neighbourhoods are genuinely twelve times more orderly than Dutch ones, or Croatians report differently, cannot be settled from this data.

Why it is published at all

Despite everything above, the indicator has a purpose. Perceived safety affects whether people walk, use public space, let children out and remain in a neighbourhood — behaviour that recorded crime statistics do not capture and that matters for how a place functions.

It should be read as a measure of how a population experiences its environment, which is what it is, and never as a measure of crime, which it is not.

Reporting crime, violence or vandalism in the area, 2023

EU average 10.0Greece — 20.9 % of population · Gap to EU average +10.9 (percentage points, derived)Greece20.9Netherlands — 16.7 % of population · Gap to EU average +6.7 (percentage points, derived)Netherlands16.7Bulgaria — 15.6 % of population · Gap to EU average +5.6 (percentage points, derived)Bulgaria15.6Poland — 2.8 % of population · Gap to EU average −7.2 (percentage points, derived)Poland2.8Lithuania — 2.7 % of population · Gap to EU average −7.3 (percentage points, derived)Lithuania2.7Croatia — 1.4 % of population · Gap to EU average −8.6 (percentage points, derived)Croatia1.4-123% of populationaxis does not start at zero
Reporting crime, violence or vandalism in the area, 2023
Country% of populationGap to EU averagepercentage points, derived
Greece20.9+10.9
Netherlands16.7+6.7
Bulgaria15.6+5.6
European Unionaggregate10.0
Poland2.8−7.2
Lithuania2.7−7.3
Croatia1.4−8.6
Reporting crime, violence or vandalism in the area, 2023. Three highest and three lowest EU Member States, with the EU aggregate for reference. The gap column is derived by Silver Data Lab from the two published values and is not itself published by the source. Source: Eurostat, sdg_16_20. This is a perception question asked of households, not a count of recorded offences. It measures what people report about where they live.

What these figures cannot tell you

Perception, not incidence
The question asks what households report about their area, not what offences occurred. Recorded crime statistics rank Member States differently, and neither series validates the other.
Reporting norms differ between countries
What counts as a problem worth reporting depends on expectations about public order. Populations accustomed to a well-maintained environment may register deterioration that others would not, which affects cross-country comparison directly.
Density affects visibility
Vandalism and public disorder are more visible where people live closer together. The most densely populated Member States are over-represented at the top of this ranking.
2023, not 2025
Eurostat publishes no values for this indicator for 2024 or 2025 at the extraction date, so this study uses 2023 and is not comparable with the 2025 readings elsewhere on this site.

Frequently asked questions

How many Europeans report crime in their neighbourhood?
10.0% of the EU population reported crime, violence or vandalism in their area in 2023. The figure comes from a household survey question and is not a count of recorded offences.
Which EU country reports the most neighbourhood crime?
Greece at 20.9%, followed by the Netherlands at 16.7% and Bulgaria at 15.6%. The Dutch position is the one that shows this measure is not a crime statistic: it is among the Union's wealthiest Member States with the lowest NEET rate.
Which reports the least?
Croatia at 1.4%, Lithuania at 2.7% and Poland at 2.8%. A rate of 1.4% means roughly one household in seventy reports any problem of this kind.
Does this measure actual crime?
No. It measures what households say about their local area, which is affected by population density and by what people expect of public space. Recorded crime statistics rank Member States differently, and this indicator should be read as perceived environment rather than as crime.

Methodological note

Eurostat collects this indicator through EU-SILC as a household question on whether crime, violence or vandalism occurs in the local area. This study uses the total population regardless of poverty status or household composition.

Values are for 2023. Eurostat publishes no values for 2024 or 2025 at the extraction date, which is why an older reference year is used.

The ratio between the highest and lowest Member State is derived by Silver Data Lab. The comparisons with life satisfaction, unmet medical need, housing costs and population density draw on companion studies on this site.

Source data

The underlying series can be inspected and re-downloaded from the Eurostat data browser. The filters below are the ones applied.

  • Population reporting occurrence of crime, violence or vandalism in their area

    sdg_16_20

    Filters applied:
    freq=A · hhcomp=TOTAL · rskpovth=TOTAL · unit=PC · time=2023
    Extracted:
    2026-08-11
    Source last updated:
    2026-05-21

Download the data

The data the study you have just read is built on, exactly as it was downloaded and archived.

Yours as a Member.

Data downloadable by Members

Ask the research desk

A question about this study — a definition, a filter, a break in the series, what the figures can and cannot support — answered by the desk that made the extraction.

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA v3. Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. reCAPTCHA loads only when you start writing, and how we handle what you send is set out in our Privacy Policy.

Members can write to the research desk