Lithuania Is the Only EU Country Where Women Are More Likely to Be in Work Than Men

Silver Data Lab Research Desk · Statistical analysis · Published on 14 June 2026

Data source
Eurostat
Reference period
2025
Last updated
14 June 2026

Key estimates

  • Male employment exceeded female employment by 9.6 percentage points across the EU in 2025.
  • Italy records the widest gap at 19.1 points, ahead of Romania at 18.7 and Greece at 17.4.
  • Lithuania records −0.6: female employment exceeds male employment.
  • Estonia at 0.5 and Finland at 1.3 are the next narrowest.
  • The gap is derived by subtraction from the two published employment rates and is labelled as derived.
Gender employment gap for those aged 20 to 64 in 2025, in percentage points: Italy 19.1, Romania 18.7 and Greece 17.4 above the EU gap of 9.6, and Finland 1.3, Estonia 0.5 and Lithuania minus 0.6 below it.

One number that separates the Union into two groups

The gender employment gap is the difference between the share of men aged 20 to 64 in work and the share of women. Across the EU in 2025 it was 9.6 percentage points: 80.9% of men and 71.3% of women.

The distribution behind that average is not a gradient. It is closer to two clusters with a thin middle.

The wide end

Italy records 19.1 points, the widest in the Union. Romania follows at 18.7, Greece at 17.4, Malta at 12.4 and Poland at 11.3.

The gap between third and fourth place is 5.0 points — larger than the distance between fourth and eleventh. Italy, Romania and Greece are separated from the rest of the Union rather than merely leading it.

For Italy this is the mechanism behind its position at the bottom of the overall employment ranking. Italian men record 77.1% employment, below the EU male figure of 80.9% but unremarkable; Italian women record 58.0%, the lowest female rate in the Union.

The narrow end, and the one that reverses

Lithuania records −0.6 points: Lithuanian women are more likely to be in work than Lithuanian men. It is the only Member State in the Union where that holds.

Estonia at 0.5 and Finland at 1.3 follow, then Latvia at 1.9 and Sweden at 3.9.

The Baltic states occupy three of the four narrowest positions. That is the same group that appears at the top of the life expectancy gender gap ranking, where Latvian women outlive Latvian men by 9.8 years — the widest in the Union.

Those two facts are related in a way worth stating carefully: in the Baltics, women participate in the labour market at rates equal to or above men's, and men die substantially earlier. This study establishes both figures from separate sources and does not claim a causal link between them.

What a narrow gap does not tell you

Lithuania's reversed employment gap sits alongside the third-widest income inequality in the Union, at an S80/S20 ratio of 6.5. Equality of participation and equality of outcome are different measures, and Lithuania scores at opposite ends of the two.

Gender employment gap, aged 20-64, 2025

EU average 9.6Italy — 19.1 Percentage points · Gap to EU average +9.5 (percentage points, derived)Italy19.1Romania — 18.7 Percentage points · Gap to EU average +9.1 (percentage points, derived)Romania18.7Greece — 17.4 Percentage points · Gap to EU average +7.8 (percentage points, derived)Greece17.4Finland — 1.3 Percentage points · Gap to EU average −8.3 (percentage points, derived)Finland1.3Estonia — 0.5 Percentage points · Gap to EU average −9.1 (percentage points, derived)Estonia0.5Lithuania — -0.6 Percentage points · Gap to EU average −10.2 (percentage points, derived)Lithuania-0.6-321Percentage pointsaxis does not start at zero
Gender employment gap, aged 20-64, 2025
CountryPercentage pointsGap to EU averagepercentage points, derived
Italy19.1+9.5
Romania18.7+9.1
Greece17.4+7.8
European Unionaggregate9.6
Finland1.3−8.3
Estonia0.5−9.1
Lithuania-0.6−10.2
Gender employment gap, aged 20-64, 2025. Three highest and three lowest EU Member States, with the EU aggregate for reference. The gap column is derived by Silver Data Lab from the two published values and is not itself published by the source. Source: Eurostat, lfsi_emp_a.

What these figures cannot tell you

A derived figure
Eurostat publishes male and female employment rates separately. The gap is computed by Silver Data Lab by subtraction and is labelled as derived wherever it appears.
Participation, not quality
The measure counts whether people are employed, not on what terms. A country can narrow its gap by moving women into part-time or low-paid work, and this indicator would record that as progress.
The 20 to 64 band
Employment gaps differ substantially by age, and the gap among younger cohorts is narrower than among older ones in most Member States. A single figure across the band conceals that.
Percentage points, not ratios
A gap of 9.6 points means different things at different employment levels. The same difference is proportionally larger in a country with low overall employment.

Frequently asked questions

What is the gender employment gap in the EU?
9.6 percentage points in 2025: 80.9% of men aged 20 to 64 were in employment against 71.3% of women. The gap is computed by subtraction from the two published rates.
Which EU country has the widest gender employment gap?
Italy, at 19.1 percentage points in 2025, followed by Romania at 18.7 and Greece at 17.4. Those three are separated from the rest of the Union by a clear margin.
Is there an EU country where more women work than men?
One. Lithuania records −0.6 percentage points in 2025, meaning female employment exceeds male employment. Estonia at 0.5 and Finland at 1.3 are the next narrowest.
Does a narrow employment gap mean equality?
Not by itself. Lithuania has the Union's only reversed employment gap and its third-widest income inequality. Equal participation and equal outcomes are different measures and can point in opposite directions.

Methodological note

Male and female employment rates for the population aged 20 to 64 are published separately by Eurostat. The gender employment gap used here is the male rate minus the female rate, computed by Silver Data Lab and labelled as derived; Eurostat does not publish the difference.

Values are for 2025, the most recent year with complete coverage of the 27 Member States at the extraction date.

The comparisons with the life expectancy gender gap and with income inequality draw on companion studies on this site, each from a separate extraction, and are presented as observations from independent sources rather than as a combined finding.

Source data

The underlying series can be inspected and re-downloaded from the Eurostat data browser. The filters below are the ones applied.

  • Employment and labour force by sex and age — annual data

    lfsi_emp_a

    Filters applied:
    freq=A · indic_em=EMP_LFS · unit=PC_POP · age=Y20-64 · sex=M, F · time=2025
    Extracted:
    2026-08-11
    Source last updated:
    2026-06-11

Download the data

The data the study you have just read is built on, exactly as it was downloaded and archived.

Yours as a Member.

Data downloadable by Members

Ask the research desk

A question about this study — a definition, a filter, a break in the series, what the figures can and cannot support — answered by the desk that made the extraction.

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA v3. Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. reCAPTCHA loads only when you start writing, and how we handle what you send is set out in our Privacy Policy.

Members can write to the research desk